Hebrews 7:18
for, on-one-hand, un-place-sis[i.e. state of setting aside, discarding]/nullification/rejection is-being-become of{[the] leading-before/ahead command} through the of{same} weak and unprofitable,
Garth's Hyper-literal Translation
In The King James Version
In Context
Cross References
Acts 13:39and from of{all which} you-are_not_enabled in to{the law} of{Moses} to-be-justified. In to{the-same[masculine]} every, the believing, is-being-justified.
Romans 8:3for the unenabled/unempowered of{the law} in to{which} has-been-being-weakened through of{the flesh}, the God dispatch[ing] the of{sameself} Son in to{like-effect} of{sin flesh}, and about of{sin} judges-against the sin in to{the flesh},
Galatians 3:17Moreover, I-am-saying the-same; [a] through-placement/disposition/covenant having-been-pre-validated/sanctioned/ratified/decreed under of{the God} into Anointed, the law, having-become alongside four-hundred and thirty years, is_not_invalidating/un-sanctioning/un-ratifying/un-decreeing into the to-unemploy/idle/disuse the message-upon-ia/declaration,
Galatians 4:21Be-saying to{me}, the[plural] will-ing to-be-being under law, you-are_not_hearing the law[?],
Hebrews 7:11So, if, on-one-hand, accomplish-sis[i.e. state of accomplishment] has-been-being through of{the Levitical consecrated-ness[i.e. priestly nature]}, for the people has-been-law-placed upon of{same}, what[?] still need according-to the set-sis[i.e. set state]/order/arrangement [of-]Melchizedek [is a] different-other to-be-standing-up/anew consecrated[i.e. priest], and not according-to the set-sis[i.e. set state]/order/arrangement [of-]Aaron, to-be-being-said/accounted/reckoned[?],
Hebrews 8:7for if supposing the first, the-there, has-been-being blameless, not of{second} [a] place has-been-being-sought,
Matthew Henry on Hebrews 7:12-28
Melchisedec and Christ Compared. ( a. d. 62.) 11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. 13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar. 14 For it is evident that… Read the whole commentary →